DNC Admits in Court, They Have Right to Rig Their Primary

7 Jaw-Dropping Revelations From Hearings on the Motion to Dismiss the DNC Fraud Lawsuit

Last Tuesday, Senior U.S. District Judge William J. Zloch heard oral arguments regarding a Motion to Dismiss filed by attorneys representing the Democratic National Committee and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz in the class action lawsuit filed against them. The lawsuit seeks damages on behalf of Democratic Party donors who made financial contributions to Bernie Sanders and the Party under the presumption the primary would be conducted fairly per the DNC’s Charter. The lawsuit was filed in June 2016 following the release of leaked emails showing behind-the-scenes collusion between the DNC, the Clinton campaign, and other entities to ensure Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic nominee prior to Americans casting votes in the party’s primary contests.

Transcripts released from the hearing Friday expose numerous shocking revelations presented by the Democrats’ counsel arguing in support of the Motion to Dismiss regarding the way the Democratic Party views its obligations and responsibilities in conducting the primary nominating process. Judge Zloch did not issue a ruling from the bench; he will issue a written order in response to the Motion to Dismiss at a later, unspecified date as he considers the merits of the defendants on the Motion.

The Democratic Party views itself as having authority to favor a candidate without any legal repercussions.
Without any pretense the Democratic primary nominating process should be expected to be conducted fairly, lawyers for the Democratic Party tell Judge Zloch the lawsuit should be thrown out because the Party has the freedom to determine its nominees by “internal rule”, not voter interests, and thus the party “could have favored a candidate”.




About vivaliberty 1334 Articles
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
Contact: Website

3 Comments on DNC Admits in Court, They Have Right to Rig Their Primary

  1. Of course they have right to rig their own primary, and all you donators to Barry Sanders got suckered. Did you actually think that anyone buy the head of the Clinton Crime Family would be selected? Shame on you for being obtuse.
    And shame on you for believing that Sandy Hook wasn’t a hoax. The school was closed down in 2008, five years before the alleged shooting, due to asbestos contamination, broken concrete, algae and water damage, and a busted furnace. We know for a fact that no tri-annual maintenance records, required by law, were presented at an FOIA Hearing. Also, sworn testimony at an FOIA Hearing states that the DHS paid for the flashing electronic sign “EVERYONE MUST CHECK IN”. Sandy Hook was a drill, with the rehearsal on 12-13-12 and the drill on 12-14-12. That’s why those fraudulent web sites were set up 1 – 3 days in advance. Go look online to verify. The fraud web sites were set up in advance because some parents were confused over the dates outlined in the Sandy Hook Manual. And since NO ONE died at Sandy Hook, all of those donations totaling $29 million were obtained fraudulently.

    • I know that s lady fro. Knoxville tn use to work there and was on the news here the same day and disappeared the next no one knows where she is.very suspicious.

    • I always wondered why the dems didn’t go full retard on Sandy Hook. When I first heard of the story, I thought, this is it. This is where the 2nd Amendment gets excised from the Constitution.

      Yet nothing happened. And that was suspicious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.